![]() I actually think most good players will win more at 1/3 than 2/5 as people most often overvalue their hands on later streets and even with the rake it is very beatable as people are quite loose. 5/10 is def a very tough game and the 10/25 I would say is full of NLHE specialists/regs. If you can beat the stupid rake that it!ΔΆ/5 is still profitable as there are plenty of players who have too much $ to play 1/3. ![]() I could imagine it being the case in EBH. I remember back in the days struggling to decide if playing smaller would actually be more profitable. I'd be curious to know if it is still generally true. ![]() Is 1/3 still filled with weak players who have no clue what they are doing, while 2/5 and 5/T is filled with decent, fairly nitty players making it hard to profit? Can anyone do a report on the state of the games there?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |